Repco Holdings V Public Prosecutor
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor 1997 3 mlj 681 high court kuala lumpur gopal sri ram jca criminal revision no w 43 7 of 1997 2 october 1997 fakta kes.
Repco holdings v public prosecutor. Perkara ini katakana bercanggah dengan artikel 145 3 perlembagaan yang hanya menyatakan peguam negara. Peguam membantah kehadiran pegawai pendakwa dibawah seksen 126 2 yang membenarkan pendakwaan dijalankan oleh pendaftar syarikat. To assist him the public prosecutor may appoint and authorise other persons such as the assistant and deputy public prosecutors advocates police officers. Putrajaya oct 12 the court of appeal today dismissed an appeal by former executive chairman of repco holdings bhd low thiam hock for a review of the notes of proceedings by the sessions court judge which had convicted and sentenced him to five years jail and fine of rm5 million for attempting to manipulate the stock market in 1997.
Constitutional law constitution infringement of whether s 126 2 of the securities industry act 1983 and s 39 2 of the securities commission act 1993 were ultra vires art 145 3 of the. Repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor. Pp v repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor pp has sole and exclusive authority to institute proceedings. Repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor 1997 3 mlj 681 section 86 of the securities industry act 1983 false or misleading statements etc.
Constitutional law constitution infringement of whether s 126 2 of the securities industry act 1983 and s 39 2 of the securities commission act 1993 were ultra vires art 145 3 of the. Criminal revision no w 43 7 of 1997. 2 repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor 1997 3 mlj 681 tuduhan adalah dibawah suruhanjaya sekuriti. Pemohon iaitu repco holdings bhd repco telah dipertuduhkan oleh suruhanjaya sekuriti suruhanjaya tersebut.
High court kuala lumpur gopal sri ram jca. Criminal revision no w 43 7 of 1997. Repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor 1997 3 mlj 681 facts section 86 securities industry act 1983 section 126 2 securities industry act 1983 and section 39 2 securities commission act 1993 article 145 3 federal constitution. High court kuala lumpur gopal sri ram jca.
Ex repco holdings bhd executive chairman low thiam hock was today sentenced to five years jail and fined rm5 million for manipulating the company s share during the 1997 stock market crash. Difference between consent and. Repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor.
Repco Low Found Guilty Of Market Manipulation The Edge Markets
Repco Holdings Bhd V Public Prosecutor 1997 3 Mlj 681 Facts Section 86 Course Hero
Law 4310 04 Public Prosecutor Law Studocu
Repco Holdings Bhd V Public Prosecutor 1997 3 Mlj 681 Facts Section 86 Course Hero
Ex Repco Holdings Boss Jailed Five Years Fined Rm5 Million
Chapter 2 Consent Sanction Criminal Procedure Ii Law 611 Studocu
Repco Holdings Bhd V By Zai Osman
Chapter 1 An Introduction To The Concept Of Law In Malaysia Jan Apr 2017 2 Bg 201 Business Law Malaysian Perspective Chapter 1 An Introduction To Course Hero
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
1997 3 Mlj 681 Repco Holdings V Public Prosecutor Youtube
344051 102034 The Office And Power Of The Public Prosecutor Studocu
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
